August 21, 2009

Facebook Privacy Guide

Erudite tech site Ars Technica has published a short reference to Facebook privacy features:
Many users are aware that Facebook has numerous privacy controls, for example, but even the most experienced Facebook users often don't know just how much they can control who sees what. For instance, did you know that you can specify exactly who can see your status updates, down to different groups of friends (not just "friends" versus "everyone")? What about controlling which groups of people can even find you in a Facebook search to begin with?

April 21, 2009

Data mine online profiles with one keypress

Glenn Jones' Identify Firefox browser plugin uses Google's Social Graph API to correlate identities between social networking and media-sharing sites. Says ReadWriteWeb:
Jones's tool is a Firefox plug-in you can evoke from any web page that has links tagged rel="me". Just click the control key and the "i" key to get a pop-up offering information put together from all around the web about the person the page is associated with. It works on Twitter profile pages, LinkedIn pages, blogs with good markup and other profile pages.

The data that gets displayed can be frightening if you've exposed more information about yourself than you'd like on a rel="me" linked page.

Explicit is the potential for data mining personally identifiable information online:
The tool is clearly very useful as a way to learn more about people whose usernames you come across online.

April 18, 2009

You may be a Canadian citizen. Then again, you may not...

The WSJ reports that an amendment to Canada's Citzenship Act automatically restores nationality to many children of Canadian citizens forced to renounce it or born outside the country, and to their children's children:
Eligible individuals automatically become Canadian citizens. But they don't get proof of that citizenship unless they apply for it, meaning other countries -- including those that allow people to be citizens of only one nation -- won't be alerted, according to the immigration office spokeswoman. Those people also may renounce their citizenship rights, she said.

The citizenship bonanza is the byproduct of a decades-long struggle by a motley group of people who claim they were unfairly denied or lost their Canadian nationality. Canadian families who crossed the border in 1947 to 1977 to have their babies in a U.S. hospital found those children weren't recognized as Canadians unless the families registered them with the government. Some foreign brides of Canadian World War II servicemen lost their citizenship if they stayed out of the country for a decade or more.

Then there are the Canadian Mennonites who moved to Mexico in the 1920s to the 1960s. When their children and grandchildren returned to Canada, many found their nationality unclear.

Some such cases languished in litigation for years. Others surfaced in 2007, when new U.S. rules requiring passports for travel between Canada and the U.S. uncovered significant numbers of people who thought they were Canadian, but weren't.

April 5, 2008

Magstripe Bandits

Jack Dunning says the mail-order companies are really in the business of selling your personal information. Their partners in crime are credit agencies, and with the power of a card swipe they tie it all into a neat little package to be sold at a high markup:

She even gives a blueprint of how to pull off the caper. You lift the information from the magnetic strip on the back of the card, which normally includes the card holder’s name and address. Then, proceed to the third party data service -- which Experian provides -- to append the extra juicy stuff like your age, income, occupation, education, home value, and the list goes on and on. They even know if you gamble, drink, smoke and have your medical ailments and prescriptions taken.



The first rule of personal privacy: use cash. The second rule of personal privacy: USE CASH.

March 1, 2008

Defeat infrared surveillance cameras

A German arts group is publicizing a technique to defeat surveillance cameras that can see in the infrared range by overwhelming their arrays with infrared light from IR LEDs mounted on a headband or hat.

According to commenters, this technique would work best against low-light surveillance cameras with particular sensitivity in the infrared range, optimized for low-light situations.

Many cameras have sensitivity into the IR but wouldn't be so easily overwhelmed by the brighter infrared LEDs.

Security Insider claims this technique would only work intermittently against cheap CCTV cameras:
I can tell you that this may work for a second or two on cameras that have a cut filter (that's the real name for "IR sensitive" cameras), but all that is really going to happen is your face will get illuminated in between the frames that are actually "flared" out by the light. Also, you're more likely to be noticed doing this due to the motion detection alarms going off due to the large pixel change. You would be much better off with a laser, than an LED. We've been doing these type of tricks for years in the lab to try to trick the cameras. Anymore, its not the cameras you need to trick, but the intelligent video algorithms that are going to pick up on the anomaly and register it as an event. Oh, one more thing. Don't even try to attempt this during the daytime. Like another poster said, the cut filter doesn't activate until a timer either trips it (set on a schedule) or a preset low lux threshhold is met. (it gets dark). Even then many cameras these days have dynamic range circuits that will tame the bright spots and highlight the dark spots. Look up some Pelco, Panasonic, or Sony cctv specs for more info.

February 25, 2008

The black box in your car

Event Data Recorders, EDRs, have been used by car manufacturers on fleet vehicles since the 1970s to collect data about performance of airbags and other safety features in the event of a vehicle impact. Much like an aircraft "black box", current EDRs record vehicle speed, engine RPM, whether the driver's seat belt is latched, and the position of brake and accelerator pedals, as well as information about the status and deployment of the air bag.

General Motors started including black boxes on higher-end models, like Cadillacs, in 1994, and was putting them in all passenger car models by 1999. Some other makes, like Toyota and Ford, have been using them in some cars since 1996, and Ford has included event data recorders in all models since 2000. Approximately 64% of model year 2005 cars have event data recorders.

IIHS says "General Motors, Ford, Isuzu, Mazda, Mitsubishi, Subaru, and Suzuki voluntarily equip all of their vehicles with EDRs, according to NHTSA's estimates. More than half of Toyotas have the devices, too. Passenger vehicles from BMW, Daewoo, Honda, Hyundai, Kia, Mercedes, Nissan, Porsche, and Volkswagen don't have what NHTSA defines as EDRs, according to the agency's estimates of 2004 and 2005 models."

Tools are available to download Ford and GM EDR data, but only Toyota can read Toyota data recorders. One vendor provides an online list of cars with event data recorders accessible by their crash data retrieval tool. NHTSA has mandated manufacturers provide tools to download EDR data within 90 days.

The biggest privacy issue is from police or accident investigators, working on behalf of lawyers or insurers, using these tools to download data without consent from one or more vehicles involved in a crash. Police or private investigators could seek the recorded data for other types of cases, though, such as car theft or chops shop busts. It's not even hard to imagine a high-profile, high-stakes custody case where one parent is looking for evidence that their ex-partner was speeding with the kids in the car.

Recent legislation or court orders could force disclosure of EDR data even if laws give ownership of that data to vehicle owner or lessee.

Insurers Encouraged to Harvest Data

[T]he Texas-based company offers insurance carriers the ability to retrieve, harvest, and store data concerning the events of a collision and provides analysis and interpretation of the data. [...] "for use in claims adjudication".

The initial question which springs to mind is how insurers are obtaining the data in the first place. If the vehicle is repairable and the information is coming from a vehicle intended to be returned to the owner, is the insurer, body shop, or someone associated with Injury Sciences LLC extracting the information? Searching the company's website does not provide the answer, but it suggests that insurers and/or body shops are accessing the information themselves. Otherwise, the company offers "access to a network of service providers" who are equipped to harvest the data.

If insurers are mining data without disclosing that activity to the insured or the third party, they may well be engaging in unfair claims practices or violations of privacy rights under individual state law. If insurers use this data against their own insureds, that action could easily be the basis for a bad faith insurance claim and could have broader implications as well.

Event Data Recorders and privacy



  • Experts agree that EDRs are extremely impractical to disable, because they are almost always integrated into the car's existing computers. They are factory installed and are not optional features on the cars that are built with them.
  • Know if any cars you drive regularly have EDRs. Toyota, Ford and GM currently disclose the existence of the recorder in the vehicle owner's manual. NHTSA has ruled that all manufacturers will have to disclose EDRs included in their cars made after September 1, 2010.
  • Check auto insurance and car rental contracts for stipulations requiring you to give the access to an EDR, or turn over EDR data in the event of an accident, perhaps under general provisions requiring you to cooperate with your insurer.
  • Don't consent to anyone downloading data from the EDR unless advised to do so by your lawyer. In this event, keep copies of your signed consent form.
  • Assume that even if your car has no EDR, any modern car involved in an accident is likely to have one, and any collision is likely to be recorded by traffic surveillance cameras.
  • EDR data belongs to the car's owner or lessee. Until served with a court order, there is no compulsion to turn EDR data over to any investigators, insurance companies or lawyers. You might be able to contract to have the EDR data preemptively erased before any such court order is issued, if you feel that erasure would protect your rights.

February 16, 2008

The Anonymity Experiment

A Popular Science writer spends a week staying anonymous in the digital age: paying cash, dodging surveillance cameras and using disposable cellphones.